Cases 1 - 10 of 16
KIEHLMEIER-STRATTON v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KIEHLMEIER-STRATTON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., HEIDI KARASH and JOSEPH KOHLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00973
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
EUBANKS et al v. MTD PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00490
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. EUBANKS and ELIZABETH EUBANKS
Defendant:
MTD PRODUCTS, INC. and BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEAY v. SAGER et al
as 1:2016cv00130
Plaintiff:
STRATTON PEAY
Defendant:
SAGER, BERRY, SMAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DENNY et al v. BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION et al
as 3:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DENNY and AMY DENNY
Defendant:
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION , BRIGGS & STRATTON POWER PRODUCTS GROUP, LLC and LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STRATTON v. MEEKS
as 1:2013cv00371
Petitioner:
TYREE STRATTON
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CLECCKLEY et al v. CITY OF BEAVER FALLS et al
as 2:2012cv01835
Plaintiff:
SAUN CLECKLEY and VICTORIA CLECKLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF BEAVER FALLS, ROBERT E. APPLEGARTH, TRENT HUMPHRIES, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STRATTON v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv01190
Petitioner:
ROBERT STRATTON
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN, SETH WILLIAMS and LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STRATTON v. STEVE et al
as 2:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STRATTON
Defendant:
STEVE, BRIAN COLEMAN, BARRIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
