Cases 31 - 40 of 505
Sharp v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq01674
Plaintiff:
William Sharp
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Valenzuela et al v. Sharp et al
as 1:2023cv02239
Plaintiff:
Rachel Valenzuela and Miracle Boyd
Defendant:
#12950 David Sharp, #17643 Michael Wilson, #6789 Nicolas Jovanovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eddie Hatch, Jr., et al v. J. P. Stadtmueller
as 23-1481
Petitioner:
EDDIE L. HATCH, JR. and MICHELLE DAVIS-HATCH
Respondent:
J. P. STADTMUELLER
Interested Party:
CITY OF MILWAUKEE, TOM BARRETT, JEFF HANEWALL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
SHARP v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
WHITNEY L. SHARP
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Eddie Hatch, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee, et al
as 23-1013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDIE L. HATCH, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MILWAUKEE, TOM BARRETT, JEFF HANEWALL and others
SHARP et al v. CONYERS et al
as 1:2022cv02425
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHARP
Defendant:
REINHARDT, CHRISTINA CONYERS, IRENE O. IGLIONOSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHARP v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv02414
Petitioner:
TRACY SHARP
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
KATILYN KING
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Wade v. Luster et al
as 4:2022cv04121
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wade
Defendant:
Mark Luster, Jamar Range, Roy Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
