Cases 31 - 40 of 96
SHARP v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03800
Plaintiff:
MELISSA SHARP
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
SHARP v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv00405
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
MELISSA K. SHARP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bauer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv00300
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Crystal Sharp Bauer
Not Yet Classified:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SHARP v. LIEBEL et al
as 1:2019cv01990
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. SHARP
Defendant:
DAVID LIEBEL, STANLEY KNIGHT, JEREMY JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock v. Sevier et al
as 3:2019cv00376
Plaintiff:
Barry W Matlock and Barry Wade Matlock
Defendant:
Greg Sheward, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Captain Earhardt and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE et al v. USA GYMNASTICS, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01716
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYMNASTICS FOUNDATION, USA GYMNASTICS, INC., SHARP'S GYMNASTICS ACADEMY and others
Plaintiff:
KELLY CUTRIGHT, M DOE and M. DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHARP v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03374
Plaintiff:
MARCE SHARP
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CHAPO et al v. JEFFERSON COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 4:2018cv00091
Defendant:
DARRELL M. AUXIER, WARREN AUXIER, LAURA BOLDERY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CHAPO, SHERRY CHAPO and DEPUTY BIG SHOT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharp v. Neal
as 3:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
Anthony P Sharp, Jr
Defendant:
Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
