Cases 11 - 20 of 117
Garner v. Jagtrux, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03444
Plaintiff:
Carl Garner
Defendant:
Jagtrux, Inc. and Sherman Lueng
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Simms v. City of Nelsonville et al
as 2:2022cv02701
Plaintiff:
Dan Lee Simms, Sr
Defendant:
City of Nelsonville, becky Barber, Harry Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Feaster v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Feaster
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Cynthia Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Trisha Sherman
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sherman v. Alloy Bellows & Precision Welding Inc., et al
as 1:2021cv01444
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SHERMAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL CANTY, STAR PRECISION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and Alloy Bellows & Precision Welding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Westbrook v. City Of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2021cv00476
Plaintiff:
Sherman Westbrook
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati, Officer Rasheen Jennings, Officer Kenneth Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Nelsonville Ohio et al
as 2:2021cv03898
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith
Defendant:
City of Nelsonville Ohio, Tony Dunfee, Elizabeth Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
