Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Silva v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Joseph Silva
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Silva Ramirez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Arcelia Silva Ramirez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Silva v. Vasos et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Nathan Silva
Defendant:
Todd J. Vasos, Michael Clabert, Warren Bryant and others
Petitioner:
Terry Dunn and Kathryn A. Caliguiri
Silva et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03972
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Silva and Rene Silva
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Silva, Jr. v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Silva, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard & Co., Inc., Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Silva v. Auld et al
as 4:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Daniel Silva
Defendant:
L. Patrick Auld, William Campbell, Rascoe S. Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Daniel Silva
as 22-5954
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL SILVA, aka Daniel Kelter
Hale v. Silva et al
as 2:2022cv12118
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kajuan D. Hale
Defendant:
Mr. John Paul Silva, Silva Property Management and 905 N Stephenson Highway LLC
Hale v. Silva Property Management et al
as 2:2022cv12112
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kajuan D. Hale
Defendant:
Silva Property Management, 905 N Stephenson Highway LLC and Mr. John Paul Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Kleyton De Sousa Carvalho, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3673
Petitioner:
KLEYTON ROGERIO DE SOUSA CARVALHO and JOSIANE DA SILVA-MATOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
