Cases 41 - 50 of 5,957
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Silva v. IHP Puerto Rican Owner, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01140
Plaintiff:
Sonia Silva
Defendant:
IHP Puerto Rican Owner, LLC, PG-IHP, LLC, DL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Balby Moreno, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1686
Petitioner:
FABIO BALBY MORENO, VERIDIANA SOUSA DA SILVA BALBY and ENZO BALBY MORENO DA SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Silva Barbosa De Oliveira, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1707
Petitioner:
RENATO SILVA BARBOSA DE OLIVEIRA and JOSE RENATO BUENO BARBOSA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
LM Insurance Corporation v. High End General Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01344
Plaintiff:
LM Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
High End General Services LLC and Odair Nolsen Da Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BINDSLEV v. SILVA
as 1:2024cv21088
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BINDSLEV
Defendant:
MELISSA CAROLINA SILVA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
SILVA v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv04003
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SILVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VItorino Silva, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1577
Petitioner:
GLEIDSON VITORINO SILVA, JULIANA MARCIA NEVES and CARLOS EDUARDO CAETANO NEVES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
