Cases 21 - 30 of 279
Zaragosa-Solis v. Gutierrez
as 4:2022cv00498
Petitioner:
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis
Respondent:
M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Donnell Tyrone Young v. Felisha Ponce et al
as 2:2022cv05847
Plaintiff:
Donnell Tyrone Young
Defendant:
Felisha Ponce, Dr. Serrano, Lt. Calwile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Johnson v. A. Meyer, et al
as 22-16160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH JAMAUL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. MEYER, Lt., A. MEDEN, Correctional Officer II, J. MARTINES, Correctional Officer II and others
Dixon v. Partida et al
as 4:2022cv04461
Plaintiff:
Bruce M Dixon
Defendant:
Ms. Partida, L. Gamboa, I Mondragon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez #275108 v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv08269
Plaintiff:
Ysidro Juan Valdez
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Hennry, Vanessa Headstream and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solis #153261 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01667
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lozano Solis
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Olmstead, Unknown Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mccain v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2021cv01317
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lee Mccain
Defendant:
Sheriff Joseph Lombardo, Jeffrey Cheesboro, Reves Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonardo Magallon v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2021cv01540
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Bakalian, Buckle and others
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Magallon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Solis-Pacho v. State of Oregon
as 6:2021cv00198
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Petitioner:
Luis Solis-Pacho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joshua Blocker v. Joel Solis et al
as 2:2020cv11764
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Joel Solis, Correctional Officer Ricardo Chirinos, Correctional Officer Joshua Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
