Cases 1 - 10 of 276
Scott #895268 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Darcy Montel Scott #895268
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts and Unknown Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2024cv11212
Plaintiff:
Darcy Montel Scott
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts and Ward
Patton v. Frank et al
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Patton #356869, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Frank, Unknown Shae, Unknown Vanwormer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Frank et al
as 4:2024cv11129
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Patton, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank, Shae, Vanwormer and others
Walker #230537 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
James Edward Walker #230537
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hood #304765 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Trensario Mario Hood #304765
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward, III v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
James V. Ward, III
Defendant:
Lansing, City of, Joseph Traverso, Damon Pulver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Parish #273839 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Jaman Amr Parish #273839
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Blair and Unknown Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston #235170 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Harvey Preston #235170
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Garcia, Unknown Nevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston v. Rewerts et al
as 4:2024cv10555
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Preston
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Garcia, Nevins and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
