Cases 1 - 10 of 1,568
Jenkins v. Campbell, et al.
as 24-2736
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE JENKINS
Defendant:
T.L. CAMPBELL, Warden, L. HURTADO, Correctional Officer and Z. MADDEN, Correctional Officer
NJOY, LLC v. Imiracle (HK) Limited et al
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
NJOY, LLC
Defendant:
Imiracle (HK) Limited, Shenzhen iMiracle Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Weiboli Technology Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Nelums et al v. Hutchens Law Firm, LLP et al
as 3:2024cv02427
Plaintiff:
John C. Nelums and Delmarshi Nelums
Defendant:
Hutchens Law Firm, LLP, PHH Mortgage Corporation, Cascade Funding Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Manuel Zuna-Paramo, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1680
Petitioner:
MANUEL ALEXANDER ZUNA-PARAMO, DEISY ANGELICA GUAMAN-BONILLA and D. S. Z.-G.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Reyes-Zuniga, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2390
Petitioner:
ANA LETICIA REYES-ZUNIGA and I. Y. R. Z.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Artis (Campbell)
as 24-922
Defendant:
MALIK CAMPBELL, SOLOMON ARTIS, LEONARD BARLETTO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garcia Valladares, et al v. Garland
as 24-9523
Petitioner:
NADIA Z. GARCIA VALLADARES and EDIS Z. ESCOTO GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Garza v. Barbier et al
as 1:2024cv02725
Plaintiff:
Jose Garza
Defendant:
Remi Barbier, Eric J. Schoen, Richard J. Barry and others
JARANIN CHAROEN COMPANY LIMITED v. Luciano et al
as 1:2024cv02562
Plaintiff:
JARANIN CHAROEN COMPANY LIMITED
Defendant:
Juan R Luciano, Michael S Burke, Theodore Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
