Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Alco Management, Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00208
Defendant:
Judy K. Devers, Alco Management, Inc, Alco Fairfax Partners, LLLP and others
Plaintiff:
Ron Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Werman v. Joyner et al
as 2:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Alfred Werman
Defendant:
Warden H. Joyner, Psycology Dr. Lefever, Mr. Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Werman v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Alfred Werman
Defendant:
H. Joyner, Dr. Lefever, Mr. Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Naszady v. E Z Portable Building, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Joseph Naszady
Defendant:
E Z Portable Building, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Kelley v. Stanzel, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Malachi Kelley
Defendant:
Stanzel, Inc., P & Z Carolina Pizza, LLC, Charles H. Zoellers and others
Crawford v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
James Darreus Crawford
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, S. Dean, Z. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whipple v. Jolley et al
as 6:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Robert Z. Whipple, III
Defendant:
David Jolley, Elaine Rivera, Charlotte Luckstone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantrell v. Conely et al
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Slim Shady
Defendant:
Johnathan Matthew Conely, Snoop Serious Pimp Records LTD, Jay Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Whipple v. Jessica, et al
as 6:2021cv00107
Defendant:
Laurel County, Edith Hacker, Jamie Mosley and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Z. Whipple, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
