Cases 1 - 10 of 252
Williams v. Doherty
as 1:2023cv15025
Plaintiff:
Larone Williams
Defendant:
Chicago, Gregory J. Doherty, Johnathan M. David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz-Zaragoza v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00585
Petitioner:
Jose Ruiz-Zaragoza
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zaragoza v. Central Booking et al
as 1:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
Enio Zaragoza
Defendant:
Central Booking and Dauphin County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Santa Cruz v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00940
Petitioner:
Enio Zaragoza Santa Cruz
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Davila v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Davila
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, Rex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mitchell Garraway v. Jacquiline Ciufo, et al
as 23-15482
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MITCHELL GARRAWAY
Defendant / Appellant:
JACQUILINE CIUFO, K. MILLER and J. ZARAGOZA
Daniel Zaragoza v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00076
Petitioner:
Daniel Zaragoza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(PC) Andrew v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv01290
Plaintiff:
Norvell Andrew
Defendant:
United States of America, Andrew Ciolli, Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv05624
Plaintiff:
Norvell Andrew
Defendant:
United States of America, Andrew Ciolli, Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
