Cases 1 - 10 of 4,317
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Armco Inc./A.K. Steel Corp. v. DOWCP
as 11-2081
Petitioner:
ARMCO INC./A.K. STEEL CORPORATION
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United States Department of Labor and PEARL CANTLEY, Widow of Charles Cantley
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
LOVE v. A.K. STEEL CORPORATION
as 3:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY TYLER LOVE
Defendant:
A.K. STEEL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GRAY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86310
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE, CRANE COMPANY, BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC. and others
Plaintiff:
RAYFORD AUBREY GRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNCAN v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86745
Plaintiff:
JOHN DUNCAN and JOHN DUNCAN
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AB ELECTROLUX, SPIRAX-SARCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCLENDON v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86755
Plaintiff:
MCNEAL MCLENDON and MCNEAL MCLENDON
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AB ELECTROLUX, SPIRAX-SARCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DOWDLE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86298
Defendant:
OAKFABCO, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS DOWDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RATCLIFF v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86362
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORP., BECHTEL CORPORATION, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLIPPARD, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86550
Plaintiff:
CLYDE RANDY CLIPPARD
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
