Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17718
Plaintiff:
AARON BALL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ball et al v. Liberty Mutual Group Inc.
as 5:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Aaron Ball and Deana Anderson
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Ball v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Travis Aaron Ball
Defendant:
B. Mitchell, J. Smith, B. Meade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Clarke
as 3:2022cv00279
Petitioner:
Travis Aaron Ball
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Travis Ball v. Jonathan English
as 21-7768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS AARON BALL
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN JONATHAN ENGLISH, Captain at the Regional Jail, NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL, Facility and TED HULL, Superintendent at the Regional Jail
US v. Travis Ball
as 20-4340
Defendant / Appellant:
TRAVIS AARON BALL, a/k/a Wiz
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02903
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
AARON BALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ball v. English et al
as 3:2020cv00027
Defendant:
Northern Neck Regional Jail, Captain FNU English and Ted Hall
Plaintiff:
Travis Aaron Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORDINGLY et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03134
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COX, CLIFFORD RILEY, PETER CAROTHERS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cordingly et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02103
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cox, Clifford Riley, Peter Carothers and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
