Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bell v. City of Spokane et al
as 2:2021cv00146
Defendant:
D Dunkin, J Curtis, E Kannberg and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron L Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. City of Spokane et al
as 2:2020cv00051
Defendant:
D Dunkin, J Curtis, E Kannberg and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron L Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Bell v. City of Philadelphia
as 15-1004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON L. BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER DAVID O'CONNOR, Badge #9846 and POLICE OFFICER COLIN GOSHERT, Badge #3210, In their personal capacities
Aaron Bell v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 14-4753
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
AARON L. BELL
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER DAVID O'CONNOR, Badge #9846 and POLICE OFFICER COLIN GOSHERT, Badge #3210, In their personal capacities
Aaron Bell v. USA, et al
as 13-4800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON L. BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
BELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv05533
Plaintiff:
AARON L. BELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL et al v. DOE et al
as 2:2013cv00380
Plaintiff:
AARON L. BELL and BOMAHNI MCNEIL
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aaron Bell v. Ibare Jone
as 12-2697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON L. BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
IBARE JONES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
BELL v. POLICE OFFICER DAVID O'CONNOR,et al
as 2:2012cv02625
Plaintiff:
AARON L. BELL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DAVID O'CONNOR and COLIN GOSHERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aaron Bell v. Ibare Jones, et al
as 11-2073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON L. BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
IBARE JONES, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
