Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Wetterling, Dale et al v. City of La Crosse et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dale Wetterling, Mary Wetterling, Ronald Martens and others
Defendant:
City of La Crosse, Wisconsin Municipal Mutual Insurance Company and ABC Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Wetterling, Dale et al v. City of La Crosse et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Dale Wetterling, Mary Wetterling, Ronald Martens and others
Defendant:
City of La Crosse, Wisconsin Municipal Mutual Insurance Company and ABC Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Christopher Hickson v. Officer Stewart
as 16-6755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HICKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER STEWART, individually and in his official capacity as a Lake City Police Officer, CHIEF OF POLICE JODY COOPER, individually and her official capacity as the former and/or present Chief of Police of the Lake City Police Department, OFFICER THOMPSON, individually and in his official capacity as a Lake City Police Officer and others
Defendant:
THE LAKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and ABC INSURANCE COMPANY
Hickson v. Stewart et al
as 4:2015cv02433
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hickson
Defendant:
John Stewart, Sandy Thompson, Kevin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irene Hairston v. Michael Easley
as 09-1870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRENE F. HAIRSTON and PEGGY MALVANIA ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL EASLEY, Governor, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BRYANT THOMPSON and others
Rossmann v. Lazarus et al
as 1:2008cv00316
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Ronald H. Lazarus, Key Title, Old Dominion Settlements, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HAIRSTON et al v. EASLEY et al
as 1:2007cv00704
Plaintiff:
IRENE F. HAIRSTON and PEGGY M. H. ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL EASLEY, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BRYANT THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
