Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Bodden v. Town of Pineville et al
as 3:2026cv00100
Plaintiff:
Cleopatra Bodden
Defendant:
Town of Pineville, Adam Daniel Roberts and Randall Down
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Adam Santos
as 25-1051
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ADAM DANIEL-DEJESUS SANTOS
Buxbaum v. Sommer et al
as 1:2024cv10080
Defendant:
Cari Joy Sommer and Adam Daniel Sommer
Plaintiff:
Michael Buxbaum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Buxbaum v. Sommer et al
as 1:2024cv09546
Defendant:
Cari Joy Sommer and Adam Daniel Sommer
Plaintiff:
Michael Buxbaum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Adam Daniel Henderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CHURAMAN-JADOO v. Daniels et al
as 1:2023cv08482
Plaintiff:
BINDIYA CHURAMAN-JADOO
Defendant:
Abraham Daniels, Adam Daniels, Aaron Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Churaman-Jadoo v. Daniels et al
as 2:2023cv08482
Plaintiff:
Bindiya Churaman-Jadoo
Defendant:
Abraham Daniels, Adam Daniels, Aaron Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28484
Plaintiff:
ADAM DANIELS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PATNAUDE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10999
Plaintiff:
ADAM DANIEL PATNAUDE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomaz Henrique Serra et al v. Adam Daniel Huckins et al
as 8:2022cv01369
Defendant:
Ally Financial, Inc., Adam Daniel Huckins, Ally, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Thomaz Henrique Serra and Maria Tamiris Cavalcante Da Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
