Cases 1 - 10 of 13
AdaptHealth, LLC v. Andres et al
as 6:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
AdaptHealth, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel San Andres, Quipt Home Medical, Corp., Faith Fairborther and others
Fried v. AdaptHealth LLC
as 1:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael Fried
Defendant:
AdaptHealth LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fried v. Adapthealth LLC
as 1:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Michael Fried
Defendant:
Adapthealth LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Snesker v. AdaptHealth, LLC.
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Tommy Snesker
Defendant:
AdaptHealth, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tessu v. AdaptHealth, LLC
as 1:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Rita Tessu
Defendant:
AdaptHealth, LLC doing business as America's Healthcare at Home
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Myrick v. ADAPTHEALTH, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Dillon Myrick
Defendant:
ADAPTHEALTH, LLC and HOME MEDICAL EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Echelon Stone CO. Inc. et al v. Adapthealth, LLC
as 1:2022cv01511
Plaintiff:
Echelon Stone CO. Inc., Echelon Partners, LLC and Donald W. Curry
Defendant:
Adapthealth, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CARTMELL v. ADAPTHEALTH, LLC, et al
as 5:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN CARTMELL
Defendant:
ADAPTHEALTH, LLC and THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. doing business as HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
