Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Elizabeth Andrews v. US
as 23-1164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIZABETH ANDREWS
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Brandee Ritsema v. US
as 23-1162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDEE RITSEMA
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
California Tribal Families Coalition, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 23-15010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA TRIBAL FAMILIES COALITION, CHEROKEE NATION, FACING FOSTER CARE IN ALASKA and others
Plaintiff:
ARK OF FREEDOM ALLIANCE and TRUE COLORS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, JANUARY CONTRERAS, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for the Administration of Children and Families, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Elizabeth Etherton v. Joseph Biden, Jr.
as 22-2085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIZABETH ETHERTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, OFFICE OF HEAD START, BERNADINE FUTRELL, PH.D. in her official capacity as Director of the Office of Head Start and others
Reynolds et al v. United States Government et al
as 7:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Save Our Children Truth Commission, Melody Rodgers, Malachi Chapman and others
Defendant:
United States Government, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Dana Davis, Lora Byers, Kimberly Vifinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA v. US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2022cv02527
Plaintiff:
CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Livingston Educational Service Agency, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 22-1257
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVINGSTON EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AGENCY and WAYNE-WESTLAND COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JOO YEUN CHANG, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary and Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Administration for Children and Families and others
Livingston Educational Service Agency et al v. Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary of et al
as 2:2022cv10127
Plaintiff:
Livingston Educational Service Agency, Saginaw Intermediate School District, Walled Lake Consolidated School District and others
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary of, Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Assistant Secretary of and others
Interested Party:
Michigan House of Representatives and Michigan Senate
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Brenda Johnson v. USA, et al
as 22-35044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDA M. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES and others
State of Texas et al v. Becerra, et al
as 5:2021cv00300
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and Lubbock Independent School District
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA,, United States Department of Health and Human Services, JOOYUEN CHANG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
