Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Torres et al v. Choukhmane et al
as 1:2024cv01029
Not Yet Classified:
Sam Rainwaters
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alberto Torres and Cynthia Ivette Torres
Defendant:
Abdellah Choukhmane, Farruukh Khaydarkulov and Agera, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
TORRES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28114
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO TORRES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv04105
Plaintiff:
Alberto Torres
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Torres-Castillo v. Garland
as 23-1460
Petitioner:
ALBERTO TORRES-CASTILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
TORRES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12577
Plaintiff:
LUIS ALBERTO TORRES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Torres v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
Alberto Torres, Jr
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Mario Garibaldi-Lopez
as 21-10259
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIO GARIBALDI-LOPEZ, AKA Mario Garibaldi, AKA Pancho, AKA Alberto Torres Alvarado
Luis Alberto Torres v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv01730
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Torres
Defendant:
United States of America - UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Renteria et al v. Torres et al
as 1:2020cv02034
Plaintiff:
ELISA CASTILLO, RAMIRO BARRAGAN and ROSA RENTERIA
Defendant:
Alberto Torres, LOS PAISANOS AUTOBUSES, a Foreign Corporations and Los Paisanos Autobuses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres v. USA
as 3:2020cv04154
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alberto Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
