Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Dansby v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04032
Petitioner:
Joseph Alexander Dansby, Sr
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hebrard v. Does
as 4:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hebrard
Defendant:
Does Frank, Store Manager, Boll Well Pawn Store #3; Alexander, Merchant/Tender, Store #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ford v. Alexander Youth Services Center
as 4:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
DeMarian Tyrell Ford
Defendant:
Alexander Youth Services Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Alexander Youth Services Center
as 5:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
DeMarian Tyrell Ford
Defendant:
Alexander Youth Services Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilcox v. Alexander et al
as 3:2024cv03008
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dwayne Wilcox
Defendant:
Gregg L. Alexander and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
