Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd. et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd., Psagot Provident Funds & Pension Ltd., Migdal Mutual Funds, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Erez Vigodman and others
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv00558
Plaintiff:
Galmi, Amram Galmi, Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Deborah Griffin, BBVA Securities, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Franklin Investors Securities Trust, Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Investment Funds and others
Interested Party:
East 71, Ltd., Brahman Partners II, L.P., Brahman Partners III, L.P. and others
Petitioner:
Waterford Township Police and Fire Retirement System, Barry Baker, Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement System of Chicago and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Shlomo Yanai, Yitzhak Peterburg, Yaacov Altman and others
Intervenor:
United States of America and HMG Global Initiative Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Certain funds and accounts managed by TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC and Teachers Advisors LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC on behalf of certain of its managed funds and accounts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd. et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv01167
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Maureen Cavanaugh, Eyal Desheh and others
Plaintiff:
Psagot Provident Funds & Pension Ltd. and Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Stichting PGGM Depositary et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv01173
Defendant:
Eyal Desheh, Sigurdur Olafsson, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg En Welzijn and Stichting PGGM Depositary
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Migdal Mutual Funds, Ltd. v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv00923
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Maureen Cavanaugh, Eyal Desheh and others
Plaintiff:
Migdal Mutual Funds, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Harel Pension and Provident Ltd. et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv00656
Plaintiff:
Harel Insurance Company Ltd., Harel Insurance Investments & Financial Services Ltd., Icic - Israel Credit Insurance Company Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Sigurdur Olafsson, Maureen Cavanaugh and others
Phoenix Insurance Company Ltd., et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., et al
as 3:2019cv00449
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Eyal Desheh, Sigurdur Olafsson and others
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Pension Ltd., Excellence Gemel & Hishtalmut Ltd., Excellence Mutual Funds and others
Oregon v. Teva Pharmaceutical Indus Ltd et al
as 3:2019cv00657
Defendant:
Eyal Desheh, Sigurdur Olafsson, Teva Pharmaceutical Indus Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
State of Oregon by and through the Oregon State Treasurer and the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Board, on behalf of the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Fund and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Migdal Insurance Company LTD et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD et al
as 3:2019cv00655
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Eyal Desheh, Maureen Cavanaugh and others
Plaintiff:
Yozma Pension Fund of Self Employed LTD, Altshuler Shaham Mutual Funds Management LTD., Provident Fund of the Employees of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Clal Insurance Company Ltd., et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., et al
as 3:2019cv00543
Plaintiff:
Clal Pension And Provident Ltd., Alumot Mutual Fund Management Company, Menorah Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Eyal Desheh, Sigurdur Olafsson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
