Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Woods v. Secretary Of State et al
as 4:2013cv02469
Plaintiff:
Allen Richardson Woods
Defendant:
Secretary Of State, Governor of Texas and Board of Pardons And Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01360
Plaintiff:
Lee Allen Richardson
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. and others
Richardson v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2013cv01360
Plaintiff:
Lee Allen Richardson
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. James Richardson
as 13-60276
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES ALLEN RICHARDSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richardson v. USA
as 1:2012cv00251
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Allen Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Woods v. Police Chief Lattimore et al
as 4:2012cv02710
Plaintiff:
Allen Richardson Woods
Defendant:
Police Chief Lattimore, Police Officer Preston Cloyd, Judge George Cason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2012cv02667
Plaintiff:
Allen Richardson Woods
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Preston Cloyd, George Cason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Henry Richardson
as 12-1420
Movant:
In re: HENRY ALLEN RICHARDSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00911
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
