Cases 41 - 50 of 190
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv13368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Domorad v. AMD ENERGY SERVICES, LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00748
Defendant:
AMD ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, Stan Bates, Mayra Dehoyos and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Domorad
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kaffel v. Bailey
as 1:2016cv01721
Plaintiff:
Amde-Meskel Kaffel
Defendant:
Josette Bailey, Phd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaffel v. Reeves
as 1:2016cv01719
Plaintiff:
Amde-Meskel Kaffel
Defendant:
Lorraine E. Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv60474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
AMD Group LLC v. Zolar Technology & Mfg. Co., Inc.
as 1:2016cv02627
Defendant:
Zolar Technology & Mfg. Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
AMD Group LLC and AMD Group LLC doing business as AMD Lasers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
AMD Management, LLC et al v. Power Up Lending Group, Ltd.
as 3:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
AMD Management, LLC , Alan Volkos and Mark Juncaj
Defendant:
Power Up Lending Group, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMD Management, LLC et al v. Power Up Lending Group, Ltd.
as 2:2015cv13997
Plaintiff:
AMD Management, LLC , Alan Volkos and Mark Juncaj
Defendant:
Power Up Lending Group, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Power Up Lending Group, Ltd. v. AMD Management, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00639
Plaintiff:
Power Up Lending Group, Ltd.
Defendant:
AMD Management, LLC, Alan Volkos and Mark Juncaj
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Power Up Lending Group, LTD. v. AMD Management, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv04068
Defendant:
AMD Management, LLC, Mark Juncaj and Alan Volkos
Plaintiff:
Power Up Lending Group, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
