Cases 21 - 30 of 388
West Virginia, State of et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
West Virginia, State of, North Dakota, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
Intervenor:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
American Farm Bureau Federation et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, United States Army Corps Of Engineers and others
Petitioner:
Bayou City Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS, Texas Commission On Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael Regan, United States Army Corps Of Engineers and others
Petitioner:
Bayou City Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
PLATKIN et al v. CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. et al
as 3:2022cv06733
Plaintiff:
J. MATTHEW PLATKIN, NJ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, cari fais and others
Defendant:
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., CHEVRON CORPORATION, EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION and others
City of Annapolis v. BP P.L.C.
as 22-2101
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY OF ANNAPOLIS
Defendant / Appellant:
BP P.L.C., BP AMERICA, INCORPORATED, BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC and SHELL OIL COMPANY
Anne Arundel County Maryland v. BP P.L.C.
as 22-2082
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY MARYLAND
Defendant / Appellant:
BP P.L.C., BP AMERICA, INCORPORATED, BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
SHELL OIL COMPANY and ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. SPELLMON et al
as 1:2022cv02586
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and others
Defendant:
LT. SCOTT A. SPELLMON and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Intervenor Defendant:
STATE OF MONTANA, AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
American Petroleum Institute, et al v. DOI, et al
as 22-1222
Petitioner:
American Petroleum Institute, American Exploration & Production Council, EnerGeo Alliance and others
Respondent:
United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and others
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16097
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
