Cases 1 - 10 of 890
In re Lantus Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016cv12652
Defendant:
Sanofi GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC and Sanofi-Aventis Puerto Rico, Inc.
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, LLC and Cesar Castillo, Inc
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RDC Liquidating Trust, by and through its trustee, Advisory Trust Group LLC, MLI Rx LLC, Burlington Drug Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re:
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party:
Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Chu v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45930
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Chu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Warrensville Heights, Ohio v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46299
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Warrensville Heights, Ohio, City of and Warrensville Heights, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Maverick County, Texas v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45426
Defendant:
RAYMOND SACKLER FAMILY, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MAVERICK COUNTY, TEXAS
Intervenor:
Maverick County Hospital District
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lewis County, Washington, et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46301
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis County, Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mental Health & Recovery Services Board of Allen, Auglaize and Hardin Counties v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46344
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Anda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mental Health & Recovery Services Board of Allen, Auglaize and Hardin Counties
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Board of Commissioners for Lucas County, Ohio et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46177
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lucas County Children Services Board of Trustees, Board of Commissioners for Lucas County, Ohio and Mental Health & Recovery Services Board of Lucas County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
RDC LIQUIDATING TRUST BY AND THROUGH ITS TRUSTEE, ADVISORY TRUST GROUP LLC et al v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01364
Plaintiff:
RDC LIQUIDATING TRUST BY AND THROUGH ITS TRUSTEE, ADVISORY TRUST GROUP LLC, MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv05209
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION, AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION and INTEGRATED COMMERCIALIZATION SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
