Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 219
Turner, Jr. et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv12458
Defendant: Fort Kent Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Dunham-Bush, Inc., Parker-Hannafin Corporation as Successor to EIS Automotive Corporation, Viking Pump, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Sally Turner and Donald Turner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Turner et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv12456
Defendant: Fort Kent Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Dunham-Bush, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Harsco Corporation f/k/a The Patterson-Kelley Co., Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Viking Pump, Inc., Grinnell LLC, Twin Disc, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Sally Turner and Donald Turner, Jr.
Cross Claimant: General Dynamics Corporation, Honeywell International Inc., Borg-Warner Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Farris et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv04186
Defendant: IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELAVAL TURBINE, INC.), BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC individually and as successor-in-interest, parent, alter ego and equitable trustee of BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION) and others
Plaintiff: MELVA FARRIS and GARY FARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hennessy Industries, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1277
Plaintiff - Appellee: HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC., for itself and as successor-in-interest to Ammco Tools, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, a Pennsylvania corporation
Kittredge v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv05527
Plaintiff: Betsy Kittredge
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ammco Tools, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
JOHNSON v. RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv82898
Defendant: UNION CARBIDE CHEMICALS AND PLASTICS COMPANY, INC., LEAR CORPORATION, WALLS AUTO AND TRACTOR PARTS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: DOROTHY MAE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAPLEY v. MINNESOTA MINING MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv87291
Plaintiff: LAURA BROWN and LAURA BROWN
Defendant: MINNESOTA MINING MANUFACTURING COMPANY, DANA CORPORATION, STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
SHAPLEY v. MINNESOTA MINING MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv87304
Plaintiff: EDWIN CHILES and EDWIN CHILES
Defendant: MINNESOTA MINING MANUFACTURING COMPANY, DANA CORPORATION, STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
SHAPLEY v. MINNESOTA MINING MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv87357
Plaintiff: LEON SHAPLEY, LEON SHAPLEY and PEARL GORDON
Defendant: MINNESOTA MINING MANUFACTURING COMPANY, DANA CORPORATION, STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?