Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martin v. City of Portland, et al.
as 26-3777
Plaintiff:
DAVID P. MARTIN and We the people, et al
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH, TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Musheer Hizam Nasser Ali v. Marco Rubio et al
as 2:2025cv04120
Plaintiff:
Musheer Hizam Nasser Ali
Defendant:
Marco Rubio, United States Department of State, Heather Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ridley v. Pina et al
as 2:2020cv01549
Plaintiff:
Frederick Lagare Ridley
Defendant:
United States Food and Drug Administration, United States Surgeon General, King County Department of Juvenile & Adult Detention and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz Mendez v. Teo Bia Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv01667
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ortiz Mendez
Defendant:
David Chung, DDT Williamsburg Corp., Teo Bia Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Chen v. Glow Asian Food, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00630
Defendant:
"John" Gao, Glow Asian Food, Inc., Qin Hsu and others
Plaintiff:
Ji Guo Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Montgomery Walker v. Dahm et al
as 4:2018cv00287
Plaintiff:
Elisa Montgomery Walker
Defendant:
Izzolena, McGregor, Courtney Doe and others
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Croom v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 1:2018cv02519
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Croom
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Randy Pfister, Dr. Obasi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
