Cases 51 - 60 of 66
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al v. Jacobs et al
as 3:2014cv05512
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Andrew Jacobs, Melanie Jacobs, Tacoma Therapy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quintero v. Long
as 1:2013cv01251
Petitioner:
Andrew Jacob Quintero
Respondent:
David Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Tacoma Therapy, Inc et al
as 3:2013cv05214
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company , Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company , Allstate Indemnity Company and others
Defendant:
Tacoma Therapy, Inc , Tacoma Rehabilitation Therapy Inc, PS , Andrew Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Korum Automotive Group, Inc. v. Salstrom Motors, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv05690
Plaintiff:
Korum Automotive Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Salstrom Motors, Inc. , Andrew Jacobs and Jane Doe Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jacobs v. Urlich
as 1:2010cv00797
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jacobs
Defendant:
G Urlich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-587
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
