Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Austin et al v. Regency Realty Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Bill Austin and Angie Austin
Defendant:
Regency Realty Inc., Regency Management Inc., Billy Cotter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Real Property
Easley v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Angie M Easley
Defendant:
Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dillard et al v. Lauderdale County, Alabama et al
as 3:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Charles "Chuck&quo Hearn, Angie King Hamilton, Lauderdale County, Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wylie Staggs, Edward Ray "Chip& Dillard and Edward Ray Chip Dillard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jordan v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv01005
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Jefferson S. Dunn and Wanda Lightner
Plaintiff:
Larry Joe Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00583
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Jefferson S. Dunn and Charles Tipton
Plaintiff:
Quinton Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00541
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Charles Tipton and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Julian Brett Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00545
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Charles Tipton and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Webster Dewayne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levert v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00546
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Jefferson S. Dunn and Charles Tipton
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Levert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00544
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Charles Tipton and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Samuel Washington, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00542
Plaintiff:
Toree Jones
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Jefferson S. Dunn and Angie Baggett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
