Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Williams v. Pilgram et al
as 9:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Williams and John Anthony Michael Wiliams
Defendant:
Lt Pilgram and Sgt Atkens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. Anthony Williams
as 24-4043
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY D. WILLIAMS, a/k/a Ray L. Dixon
Williams v. CDV Task Force et al
as 9:2023cv05068
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Michael Williams
Defendant:
CDV Task Force, Spartanburg City Police, Chief Alonzo Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Wright et al
as 9:2023cv04663
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Michael Williams
Defendant:
Chuck Wright, Sgt. Clayton, Lt. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Harford Co. Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Williams
Defendant:
Harford Co. Sheriff Department and Jamal Beech
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
US v. Anthony Williams
as 23-4388
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY WALTER WILLIAMS, a/k/a Tone, a/k/a Tony, a/k/a Anthony Walter Williams
Williams v. Spartanburg Detention Center
as 9:2022cv04142
Petitioner:
John Anthony Michael Williams
Respondent:
Spartanburg Detention Center
Defendant:
Director of the Spartanburg County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Williams v. McMahon
as 5:2022hc02180
Petitioner:
Anthony Waiter Williams and Anthony Walter Williams
Respondent:
Sheriff Ed McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
