Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Gordon v. Manning et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gordon
Defendant:
John Manning, Lee, Angela Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Weems et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gordon
Defendant:
Ronnie Weems, J. Manning, Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hain et al
as 1:2022cv06791
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Smith
Defendant:
Ron Hain, c/o Bowers, c/o Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. O'Connell
as 3:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Smith
Defendant:
Mike O'Connell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keaton v. Cartwright et al
as 3:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Robert James Keaton
Defendant:
James B. Cartwright, Anthony L. Smith, Howard A. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Belk et al
as 3:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Antowin Vashia Porter
Defendant:
Jeffery Belk, James R. Cooper, Anthony L. Smith and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00749
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bowlin v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Leslie Bowlin
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Burl Cain, Marc McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Cameron et al
as 3:2020cv00748
Defendant:
Steven P. Veno, Mike O'Connell and Daniel Cameron
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99513
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
