Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Doe v. Eisenberg
as 1:2026cv05618
Pretrial Service:
"Jenny" Doe, "Sloane" Doe, "Joe" "Doe" as the Executor for the Estate of "Andy" and others
Defendant:
Avraham Eisenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Doe et al v. Walther
as 1:2026cv00268
Plaintiff:
April Doe, Angela Doe, Chelsea Doe and others
Defendant:
David Llloyd Walther
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Doe et al v. Gross
as 4:2025cv00843
Plaintiff:
April Doe, Jenny Doe, Pia Doe and others
Defendant:
Peter Alexander Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Watson v. Wilhelm
as 24-2942
Defendant:
AVIGAIL ROSENBERG, Program Director, ALYSSA WRINKLE, Program Director, ABU B. SIDDICK, Badge #17235 and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIAM WATSON, JR.
Watson v. NYPD
as 24-2820
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS MULDER, VIDAL GUZMAN, MICAELA MARTINEZ and others
Defendant:
NYPD KRAEMER, Badge Number 15618, Mayor ERIC ADAMS, #4 INTENSIVE MOBILE TREATMENT TEAM, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Watson v. Wilhelm et al
as 1:2024cv06826
Defendant:
Tiam Clarke, Daniel J Wadoloski, Isaac Maysonet and others
Plaintiff:
Robert William Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Human v. Window Nation St. Louis, MO. et al
as 4:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Daniel Human
Defendant:
Window Nation, Window Nation, LLC, Aaron Magden and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Henry Rayford v. Johnny Crain, Jr., et al
as 20-30385
Defendant / Appellee:
APRIL DOE, JOHNNY CRAIN, JR., LISA CRAIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY RAYFORD
Rayford v. Crain et al
as 2:2019cv12348
Defendant:
Denise Robertson, Lisa Crain, April Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spann v. Crain
as 2:2019cv12123
Plaintiff:
Kelton L. Spann
Defendant:
Lisa Crain, April Doe, Johnny Crain, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
