Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Baker v. Branham et al
as 7:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Heath Anthony Baker, Ashley, Anthony Heath Baker and others
Defendant:
Christy Branham, Kentucky Parole Board, Cookie Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Williams
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Duncan Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Williams
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Duncan Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bybee v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bybee
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. and New York Life
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
Johnson v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00725
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Martha Dilmaghani, Warden Anna Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Aramark American Food Services LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00554
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arnold
Defendant:
Aramark American Food Services LLC, Aramark Aviation Services Limited Partnership, Aramark Business Facilities LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Shaffer v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00858
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Burke v. IWEBVISIT.COM et al
as 2:2020cv00131
Defendant:
Capt. Smith, Kenton Cty Det. Center, Aramark and others
Plaintiff:
Dave Burke and Davon Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush v. Kenton County Detention Center et al
as 2:2019cv00186
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Bush
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services and Kenton County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
