Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Aramark Services, Inc. Group Health Plan et al v. AETNA Life Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Aramark Services, Inc. Group Health Plan, Aramark Services Inc, Aramark Corporation and others
Defendant:
AETNA Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
English v. Aramark
as 21-20554
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jake Anthony English
Defendant / Appellee:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Correctional Services, L.L.C.
Tahri v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv04417
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Tahri
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jake English v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 19-20412
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, L.L.C. and ARAMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAKE ANTHONY ENGLISH
Hamm v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 3:2019cv00107
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Aramark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
English v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv01585
Plaintiff:
Jake Anthony English
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dykes v. Aramark Corporation
as 4:2018cv01414
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Dykes
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 7:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dewayne Booker
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Gross and Cynthia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lilly v. ARAMARK Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv17591
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lilly
Defendant:
Transocean Offshore Ventures, Inc., Transocean Offshore USA, Inc. and ARAMARK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
