Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Johnson v. University of Behavioral Health System et al
as 3:2026cv01574
Petitioner:
Marc Samuel Johnson
Defendant:
University of Behavioral Health System, Connie Hernandez, Unkown Male and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VILLALOBOS-ARCALA v. WARDEN
as 2:2018cv00118
Petitioner:
EMILIO VILLALOBOS-ARCALA
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
VILLALOBOS-ARCALA v. WARDEN
as 1:2018cv00666
Petitioner:
EMILIO VILLALOBOS-ARCALA
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Michael Trap v. Arcala Washington-Adduci, et al
as 17-56950
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. TRAP
Defendant - Appellant:
ARCALA WASHINGTON-ADDUCI, Warden, EVERETT COTTRELL, Captain, CARLOS DEVEZA, Associate Warden and others
Henry Lagmay v. Shelley Nobriga, et al
as 17-16109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY LAGMAY
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELLEY NOBRIGA, NOLAN P. ESPINDA, Warden, FRANCIS SEQUEIRA and others
Peter Tia v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 17-15612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER RAY TIA
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Tia v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Dept. of Justice, Attorney General, Department of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Dept. of Justice, Attorney General, Department of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lagmay v. Nobriga, et al
as 1:2016cv00408
Plaintiff:
Henry Lagmay
Defendant:
Shelly Nobriga, Nolan Espinda, Francis Sequeira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rory Moroney v. City of Long Beach, et al
as 2:2016cv04577
Defendant:
Det. R. Arcala, City of Long Beach, Det. E. De La Torre and others
Plaintiff:
Rory Moroney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
