Cases 1 - 10 of 29
McCook v. Department of the Army - Army Review Board Agency
as 1:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Robert E. McCook
Defendant:
Department of the Army - Army Review Board Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
McConnell v. Army Review Boards Agency
as 1:2022cv04114
Plaintiff:
Shawn McConnell
Defendant:
Army Review Boards Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bavi v. Army Review Board Agency
as 1:2022cv02358
Plaintiff:
Sena Bavi
Defendant:
Army Review Board Agency
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1553 Armed Forces: FOIA General
Putnam v. The United States Army Review Board Agency et al
as 5:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Lt. Col (Ret) Joe A Putnam
Defendant:
The United States Army Review Board Agency, The Honorable Wormuth, The Honorable Alexander Conyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jarrell v. Dept. of the Army
as 3:2020cv00194
Defendant:
Army Review Boards Agency
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Jarrell
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Scott v. Army Review Boards Agency
as 2:2020cv00087
Defendant:
Army Review Boards Agency
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jarrell v. Army Review Boards Agency et al
as 3:2019cv00349
Defendant:
Army Review Boards Agency, United States Attorney, National Personnel Records Center and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Maurice Jarrell
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Demika Porterfield v. Army Review Boards Agency
as 19-5059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Demika Porterfield
Defendant / Appellee:
Army Review Boards Agency
KELLY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2019cv00331
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel P Kelly and DANIEL P. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
PORTERFIELD v. ARMY REVIEW BOARD AGENCY
as 1:2018cv01472
Plaintiff:
DEMIKA UNTURIA PORTERFIELD
Defendant:
ARMY REVIEW BOARD AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
