Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02062
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Fossen v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Arnold Fossen
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
ARNOLD v. USBOP
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS D. ARNOLD
Defendant:
USBOP STAFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Arnold & Smith, PLLC v. Arnold & Smith Law, PLLC
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Arnold & Smith, PLLC
Defendant:
Arnold & Smith Law, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Reed v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Michael Arnold Reed
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts
ARNOLD v. USA
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Murphy v. Aramark Food Service and Facilities Management, East Carolina University et al
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Larry F. Murphy
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service and Facilities Management, East Carolina University, ARAMARK Campus, LLC, Kelvin Tarakwasha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02248
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Soto v. Town of Rolesville et al
as 5:2023cv00446
Defendant:
Town of Rolesville Board of Commissioners, Town of Rolesville, Town Council and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Arnold v. The United States of America
as 7:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Edward Arnold
Defendant:
The United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
