Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Foley v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00635
Plaintiff:
Jack Foley
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc, AT&T Inc and AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 3
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Krawczyk v. Directory Distributing Associates, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv01399
Trustee:
John P. Vaclavek
Defendant:
AT&T Advertising, LP, AT&T Corp., YP Western Directory LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James Krawczyk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Weatherford v. AT&T et al
as 6:2017cv03088
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Weatherford
Defendant:
AT&T , AT&T Inc. , AT&T Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fleck v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1, et al
as 4:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Fleck
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 and AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Curran Law Firm, LLC, et al v. Sedwick Claims Management Services, Inc., et al
as 6:2012cv03003
Defendant:
Sedwick Claims Management Services, Inc. , Bruce A. Grzyb , AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Curran Law Firm, LLC and Robert D. Curran
Third_party_plaintiff:
Bruce A. Grzyb
Third_party_defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Bruce A. Grzyb
Cross_defendant:
AT&T Disability Income Program , AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 and Sedwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Charmaine Dickens v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan #1, et al
as 09-2603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charmaine Dickens
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1- AT&T Disability Income Program, AT&T, Inc. and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Dickens v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1-AT&T Disability Income Program et al
as 3:2008cv00164
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Dickens and Charmaine Dickens
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1-AT&T Disability Income Program, AT&T Inc and Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
