Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pinney v. Police of La Salle Illinois, et al
as 24-1035
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
LASALLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LASALLE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, LASALLE COUNTY COURT and others
Pinney v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 23-2077
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER STATE HOSPITAL, DR. NIKHIL MATHEWS, CITY OF BOSTON and others
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SUMBUL SIDDIQUI, Mayor, CHRISTINE ELOW and others
Fernandez v. Greyhound Lines Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Jesus Fernandez
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc., Jarrell Perry and Kirk Lennon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Blanton v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Bradley Todd Blanton
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tinsley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joshua Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
as 4:2019cv03093
Defendant:
Patrick D. Smith, Greyhound Lines, Inc. and City of Birmingham
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-7200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Finish Line Inc.
as 1:2008cv01025
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Finish Line Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Peter Pan Bus Lines Inc.
as 1:2008cv00980
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Peter Pan Bus Lines Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
