Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Hunsinger v. Atmos Energy Corporation
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Joe Hunsinger
Defendant:
Atmos Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hunsinger v. Atmos Energy Corporation
as 3:2023cv02009
Plaintiff:
Joe Hunsinger
Defendant:
Atmos Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Henderson v. Atmos Energy
as 21-30046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steven Eugene Henderson
Defendant / Appellee:
Atmos Energy Corporation, incorrectly named as Atmos Energy
Simmons v. Edwards, et al
as 2:2020cv03195
Defendant:
John Bell Edwards, Michael E. Haefner, Atmos Energy Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Wardell Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simmons v. Edwards et al
as 2:2020cv03142
Defendant:
Oneil Mitchell, John Bel Edwards, Ruben Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Wardell Simmons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Henderson v. Atmos Engy
as 20-30691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steven Eugene Henderson
Defendant / Appellee:
Atmos Energy Corporation, incorrectly named as Atmos Energy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
St. Bernard Parish v. Entergy Louisiana, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00459
Defendant:
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC, Entergy Lousiana Holding, Inc., Atmos Energy Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
St. Bernard Parish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers et al v. Atmos Energy Corporation
as 3:2018cv00869
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Andres Portillo, Clifton Rogers and Griselda Portillo
Defendant:
Atmos Energy Corporation
Plaintiff:
Maria Rogers, Amparo Camacho and Jose Fiscal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Putz v. Atmos Energy Corporation
as 3:2017cv03280
Plaintiff:
Herbert R Putz
Defendant:
Atmos Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
