Cases 1 - 10 of 28
United States of America v. Alhassan (Tawfiq)
as 24-308
Defendant:
ADAMU ALHASSAN, GERALD ATO BARNES, Bukari and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHATIR TAWFIQ
Burlow v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2023cv12120
Plaintiff:
Kevin Burlow
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Ramiz Atto and Philip Tillison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Itria Ventures, LLC v. EBZNS Holdings LLC et al
as 5:2023cv01843
Plaintiff:
Itria Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
EBZNS Holdings LLC, Kotka LLC, Atto Fine Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
PopSockets LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
PopSockets LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, ccdz_phoneparts, HJSMAA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Fordham v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2020cv13319
Defendant:
Ramiz Atto, Philip Tillison and City of Detroit
Plaintiff:
William Fordham, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez Cuautle et al v. 45 Tudor Restaurant LLC et al
as 1:2020cv04250
Defendant:
Mirsad Lekic, Mirso Lekic, Aida Lekic and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Amaro Hernandez, Luiciano Reyes Ramon, Juan Carlos Gonzalez Cuautle and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ATTOE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv57830
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DYLAN J ATTOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
