Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Finch v. Governor State of Texas
as 21-10592
Defendant / Appellee:
Assistant Criminal District Attorney, James English, 222nd District Attorney, 222nd Judicial District Court Reporter and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Drake Jordan Finch
Robinson v. Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
Sherman Ernesto Robinson
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Texas and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2021cv00502
Plaintiff:
Sherman Ernesto Robinson
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stevie Roberson v. Ken Paxton
as 19-51041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVIE ANDRE ROBERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, Attorney General, State of Texas
E. Drake v. ACCC Insurance Company, et al
as 19-12361
Defendant / Appellee:
ORLINDA NARANJO, TREY HARLIN, PC, JOHN BURTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
E. V. DRAKE
Kareem Hodge v. Atty General, State of Texas
as 19-10035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREEM OF THE FAMILY HODGE
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF TEXAS
Elvis Jones v. US National Federal Debt, et al
as 18-12570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
US NATIONAL FEDERAL DEBT CONTRACTORS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF TEXAS and DIVERSITY OF INTERNATIONAL CITIZENSHIP
Finch v. Governor of the State of Texas et al
as 2:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
Drake Finch
Defendant:
Governor of the State of Texas, Lt. Governor State of Texas, Deputy Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Rutoskey v. D. Harmon, et al
as 17-10527
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN MITCHELL RUTOSKEY
Respondent - Appellee:
D. J. HARMON, Warden, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and KEN PAXTON, Attorney General, State of Texas
Tracy Nixon v. John Beauduy, et al
as 16-11517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY NIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. BEAUDUY, STEPHANIE WILLIAMS, KEN PAXTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
