Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Hopkins v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Rosie Hopkins
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Department of Health and Human Service Health Care Registry, Villages of Apex Club and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D.M. v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM et al
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
G. M.
Petitioner:
D. M.
Defendant:
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Sgt. Kyle Krawczyk, Officer Jamison Keltner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Pittman v. Ohno
as 5:2024ct03036
Plaintiff:
Austin Reid Pittman
Defendant:
Officer Ohno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUSTIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS AUSTIN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Kramer v. USA
as 7:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Joshua Austin Kramer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Litchfield v. USA
as 5:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Austin Tyler Litchfield
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Erwin v. Gaston County Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 3:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Kanisha Monique Latrice Erwin
Defendant:
Gaston County Department of Health & Human Services, Angela C. Karchmer, Tereasa L. Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitted v. Patterson et al
as 5:2023ct03311
Plaintiff:
Mario D. Whitted
Defendant:
Austin K. Patterson, Christina Smith and Det. Terry Dimmery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrnside v. Griffin et al
as 1:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Austin Amos Byrnside
Defendant:
Lowell Griffin, Dylan Rollins, Brandon Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
