Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Dean v. Sisolak et al
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Sean Maurice Dean
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Aaron D. Ford, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Ford et al
as 3:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael Steve Cox
Defendant:
Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Gov Sisolak and Federal Defenders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keck v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00031
Petitioner:
William Keck
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron D. Ford, Churchill County Clerks Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Richardson v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Thomas Richardson
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Ford
as 2:2021cv02233
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Paredes v. Williams et al
as 2:2021cv02232
Petitioner:
Ulises Benites Paredes
Respondent:
Brian E. Williams and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bonham v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01879
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Bonham
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Steve Sisolak, Barbara K. Cegavske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Lisle v. William Gittere, et al
as 21-99009
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN JAMES LISLE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and AARON D. FORD
Bonham v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01833
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Bonham
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Steve Sisolak, Barbara K. Cegavske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
