Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Harris v. City of Centralia et al
as 3:2022cv05129
Plaintiff:
Peter Harris
Defendant:
Centralia City of, Phillip Reynolds, John Dorff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Daniel Miller
as 21-10117
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL AARON MILLER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Ronald Schwartz, et al v. Yahoo! Inc., et al
as 20-16633
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAADYA KAUFMANN, REUVEN NATHANSON, JENNIFER J. MYERS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AABACO SMALL BUSINESS, LLC and YAHOO! INC.
Not Classified By Court:
In re: YAHOO! INC. CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
Appellant:
AARON MILLER
David Zinberg et al v. Salus Capital Partners, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07833
Plaintiff:
David Zinberg and Marina Zinberg
Defendant:
Salus Capital Partners, LLC, DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,, Kyle Shonak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marina Zinberg v. Salus Capital Partners, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07836
Defendant:
Salus Capital Partners, LLC, Aaron Miller, HRG GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Marina Zinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv00476
Plaintiff:
Aaron Miller
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2018cv03621
Plaintiff:
Aaron Miller
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Geoffrey Pecover, et al v. Aaron Mlller
as 13-16336
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEOFFREY PECOVER, ANDREW OWENS, SAMUEL MICHAEL KELLER and others
Objector - Appellant:
AARON MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
Miller et al v. Bishop White Marshall & Weibel PS
as 2:2010cv00425
Plaintiff:
Aaron Miller and Audrie Miller
Defendant:
Bishop White Marshall & Weibel PS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
