Cases 11 - 20 of 33
WILSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv01663
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHRIS ERTEL, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEACHER v. CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2022cv01304
Plaintiff:
R. PEACHER
Defendant:
Y. CHAMBERS, AARON SMITH, DUANE ALSIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREER v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv01212
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L GREER
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, AARON SMITH, LISA HAMBLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEACHER v. CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2022cv00778
Plaintiff:
R. PEACHER
Defendant:
YOLANDA CHAMBERS, AARON SMITH and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. MASON et al
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
LANICO PAYNE
Defendant:
DAVID MASON, AARON SMITH, M. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC. et al
as 1:2022cv00661
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC., M.D. MARITAL KNIESER, AMBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAIN v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
DURELL T. CRAIN
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., J. BASINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAVVARD v. REAGAL et al
as 1:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
WALTER HAVVARD
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGAL, AARON SMITH and WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv02860
Plaintiff:
COREY G. LAWSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICE, WESTVILLE CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWMAN v. BALDWIN et al
as 1:2021cv02715
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAYNEL BOWMAN
Defendant:
DENISE BALDWIN, MCCUTCHEON, BODKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
