Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pollard v. Gonzales
as 5:2023cv01103
Petitioner:
Clyde Pollard
Respondent:
Abel Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chester v. Minst et al
as 5:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
Allie Thomas Chester
Defendant:
Ray Minst, Stacy Randolph, Abel Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dewey v. Jackson County Sheriffs Dept Deputies et al
as 5:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewey
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriffs Dept Deputies, Abel Gonzales, Anita Latham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzales v. Marriott International, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Johnny Abel Gonzales
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Williams v. Levick et al
as 5:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jordan Trevon Williams
Defendant:
Roger Levick, Altus City of and Abel Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Altus City of et al
as 5:2021cv00909
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith Wilson
Defendant:
Altus City of, Abel Gonzales and Roger Levick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv53753
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ABEL GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11368
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hill, Kevin Jackson, Scott Hines and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
ALEMAN et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00265
Plaintiff:
YSIDRO ALEMAN , DAVID ALVARADO , RODNEY ATKINS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Gonzales v. Mahoney et al
as 6:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
Abel Gonzales
Defendant:
Mike Mahoney, Liz Rantz, Kohut and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
