Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Elizabeth Nelson, et al v. Service Towing, Inc., et al
as 24-1219
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH NELSON and ALBERT D. THROWER
Defendant:
SERVICE TOWING, INC., ABLE TOWING, LLC, EDWARD D. HERTZ, President and others
Nelson et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv11597
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Nelson and Albert Thrower
Defendant:
Robert Scott, Service Towing, Inc., Able Towing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Ables et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
De'Lane Andre Ross
Defendant:
Larry Ables, Officer Emery, Ruth DeLange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. McMinn County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
erin johnson, adriana wilkins and matthew able
Defendant:
McMinn County, Tennessee, McMinn County Police Department, dalton townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Service Towing Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv10918
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Nelson and John Doe
Defendant:
Service Towing Inc., Able Towing LLC, Edward D. Hertz and others
Acken v. Lasley et al (TV1)
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Robert Acken
Defendant:
Marty D Lasley, Lena Curtis, Sam Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Able v. Harden et al
as 5:2021cv00131
Defendant:
Renae Harden and Karen Tomblim
Plaintiff:
Clayton Able
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Department of Justice v. Ables d/b/a Pops Cove
as 1:2018cv01249
Defendant:
Chad David Ables d/b/a Pops Cove
Plaintiff:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Edoho-Eket v. Northwestern University et al
as 3:2018cv01022
Defendant:
ABLE Company, Nisolo Shoes and Northwestern University
Plaintiff:
Udeme Edoho-Eket
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
