Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Toy v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Toy, Sr.
Defendant:
Tameka Jones, Abraham Gates, Humphreys County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Abraham House of God and Cemetary, Inc. et al v. City of Horn Lake et al
as 3:2021cv00231
Plaintiff:
Abraham House of God and Cemetary, Inc., Mr. Property, LLC, Riyadh Elkhayyat and others
Defendant:
City of Horn Lake, Board of Aldermen of the City of Horn Lake, Planning Commission of the City of Horn Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abraham v. Abraham Development Company, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00215
Defendant:
Leila W. Abraham, Joyce A. Buttross, Robert N. Warrington and others
Plaintiff:
George Douglas Abraham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00717
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez-Rondon v. Gillis
as 5:2019cv00109
Plaintiff:
Abraham Gonzalez-Rondon
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Shawn R. Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Divine v. Mississippi
as 3:2019cv00418
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Abraham Divine
Respondent:
Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abraham v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv00050
Plaintiff:
Michael Frazier Abraham
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith, Jr. v. Hood et al
as 3:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Ralph Arnold Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
James M. Hood , Albert Lee Abraham, Jr. , Cynthia T. Eubank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
