Cases 31 - 40 of 160
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv62127
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv62126
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv24194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Nagrani v. Kendall et al
as 1:2020cv08471
Defendant:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director Sarah Kendall and others
Plaintiff:
Ishan Nagrani
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Ferreyra v. Decker
as 20-3437
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner:
Henry Ferreyra, Rolando Oshane Villiers, Jefferson Denizard and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09165
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04616
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Haza-Martin v. USCIS et al
as 1:2020cv23951
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Haza-Martin
Defendant:
Acting Secretary CHAD F. WOLF, USCIS and USCIS Kendall Field Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
